DevOps & Infrastructure
AlterLab Scientific Thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality using evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane risk-of-bias tools such as RoB 2 and ROBINS-I), assessing experimental design validity and identifying biases, confounders, statistical pitfalls, and logical fallacies. Use when judging evidence quality, grading certainty of evidence, spotting design or causal-inference flaws, identifying biases or confounders, naming statistical fallacies, or teaching critical analysis. For writing a formal submittable peer review use alterlab-peer-review; for a multi-reviewer mock panel verdict use alterlab-paper-reviewer; for IRB/consent/conflict-of-interest ethics use alterlab-research-ethics. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.
- Publisher / source
- AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills (found on the CSV list)
- Upstream record
- AlterLab-IEU/AlterLab-Academic-Skills
- Version
- Version 1
- Published
- Publication review
- Approved for publication
- Content fingerprint
f797c44142d2994d3681557d4b06b298fe7d64503a064c1871ac41c1e352c6be