Consulting & Advisory
Review existing work against the user's actual goal and surface evidence-backed strengths, gaps, risks, and next fixes. Use when asked to eval, evaluate, review, assess, or check current/this/my/our work; decide whether a task is complete; build a definition-of-done checklist or rubric; or perform grading, LLM-as-judge, Qworld, or RET evaluation. Treat plain eval/review requests as qualitative: resolve "current work" from the conversation, artifacts, files, or diff, and never assign numeric scores unless the user explicitly requests scores, grades, points, ratings, weighted criteria, Qworld, or RET. Do not use for implementing automated eval suites, tests, graders, or benchmarks.
Publisher / source
mims-harvard/ToolUniverse (found on GitHub top repositories)
Upstream record
Version
Version 1
Published
2026-11-11
Publication review
Approved for publication
Content fingerprint
a80f3e3860992bc9ff26acc5ee41702a545db9f6d2668258a48ab6543c96076e
Review before you use it
Publication approval is a recorded review state, not a guarantee of safe execution. Check the upstream license, required tools and permissions, and test in your intended client.
Sign in to inspect the full instructions and download the SKILL.md file. This public page contains metadata only.
Source: https://prompeteer.ai/skills-hub/bad7071e-4b35-458c-93b5-17b10fb2258d