Consulting & Advisory
Tooluniverse Self Review
Review existing work against the user's actual goal and surface evidence-backed strengths, gaps, risks, and next fixes. Use when asked to eval, evaluate, review, assess, or check current/this/my/our work; decide whether a task is complete; build a definition-of-done checklist or rubric; or perform grading, LLM-as-judge, Qworld, or RET evaluation. Treat plain eval/review requests as qualitative: resolve "current work" from the conversation, artifacts, files, or diff, and never assign numeric scores unless the user explicitly requests scores, grades, points, ratings, weighted criteria, Qworld, or RET. Do not use for implementing automated eval suites, tests, graders, or benchmarks.
- Publisher / source
- mims-harvard/ToolUniverse (found on GitHub top repositories)
- Upstream record
- mims-harvard/ToolUniverse
- Version
- Version 1
- Published
- Publication review
- Approved for publication
- Content fingerprint
a80f3e3860992bc9ff26acc5ee41702a545db9f6d2668258a48ab6543c96076e