Quality Assurance & Testing
Rubber Duck
Adversarial "rubber duck" review that turns explaining-out-loud into a hallucination check. The main session is the PRESENTER (it did the work — a design doc, investigation, or analysis — and holds the real reasoning) and reconstructs the topic to a LISTENER — a spawned subagent pinned to a DIFFERENT-vendor model that has NOT seen the reasoning and interrogates it adversarially, hunting inconsistencies, gaps, unsupported magnitudes, and claims stated as fact but actually inferred. Goal — artifacts that are complete, gaps that are honest, findings that are truthful. Triggers include "rubber duck this", "rubber duck review", "explain this to a skeptic", "reconcile my findings", "is my doc honest".
- Publisher / source
- kirodotdev/KiroCrew (found on GitHub top repositories)
- Upstream record
- kirodotdev/KiroCrew
- Version
- Version 1
- Published
- Publication review
- Approved for publication · recorded passed scan 2026-11-05
- Content fingerprint
c9778617cab129e950861ee0cee6371634b3b6a2371280cf0d47ef039296ca00