Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs NVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs NVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5: Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest has the larger context window (1,000,000 tokens); NVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is cheaper on input ($0.40 per 1M tokens); Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest supports more input modalities (text, image, file). Data via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.

Source: OpenRouter /models · as of 2026-07-11

Side-by-side comparison

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs NVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 — data via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11
MetricAnthropic: Claude Fable LatestNVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Context (tokens)1,000,000131,072
Input $/M$10.00$0.40
Output $/M$50.00$0.40
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Output modalitiestexttext
Model id~anthropic/claude-fable-latestnvidia/llama-3.3-nemotron-super-49b-v1.5

Frequently asked questions

Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or NVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5?

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.)

Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or NVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5?

NVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is cheaper on input at $0.40 per 1M tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.)

What input types do Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and NVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 support?

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts text, image, file; NVIDIA: Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 accepts text.

Model details

← All AI models

Build an optimized prompt for either model with Prompeteer →