Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch): MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch) has the larger context window (1,048,576 tokens); MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch) is cheaper on input ($0.70 per 1M tokens); both support 3 input modalities. Data via OpenRouter /models, as of Nov 12, 2026.
Source: OpenRouter /models · as of Nov 12, 2026
OpenRouter model catalogue feed
These are provider-catalog specifications, not a task-quality benchmark. Prices describe the source listing and may vary by provider or routing. Unknown values are shown as — when the feed did not supply that value.
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest | MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| Context (tokens) | 1,000,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Input $/M | $8.00 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $40.00 | $6.00 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text, image, video |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Model id | ~anthropic/claude-fable-latest | moonshotai/kimi-k3.1-pro:batch |
Frequently asked questions
Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch)?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch) has the larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of Nov 12, 2026.)
Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch)?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch) is cheaper on input at $0.70 per 1M tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of Nov 12, 2026.)
What input types do Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch) support?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts text, image, file; MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro (batch) accepts text, image, video.
Model details
Open the prompt composer, then choose a model →
Open the composer and choose a supported target model. The reference catalogue may include models unavailable in the composer.
Source: https://prompeteer.ai/compare/anthropic-claude-fable-latest-vs-moonshotai-kimi-k3-1-pro-batch