Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Microsoft: Phi 4
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Microsoft: Phi 4: Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest has the larger context window (1,000,000 tokens); Microsoft: Phi 4 is cheaper on input ($0.07 per 1M tokens); Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest supports more input modalities (text, image, file). Data via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-13.
Source: OpenRouter /models · as of 2026-07-13
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest | Microsoft: Phi 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Context (tokens) | 1,000,000 | 16,384 |
| Input $/M | $10.00 | $0.07 |
| Output $/M | $50.00 | $0.14 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Model id | ~anthropic/claude-fable-latest | microsoft/phi-4 |
Frequently asked questions
Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Microsoft: Phi 4?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-13.)
Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Microsoft: Phi 4?
Microsoft: Phi 4 is cheaper on input at $0.07 per 1M tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-13.)
What input types do Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and Microsoft: Phi 4 support?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts text, image, file; Microsoft: Phi 4 accepts text.
Model details
Build an optimized prompt for either model with Prompeteer →