Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3: Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 has the larger context window (1,048,576 tokens); Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper on input ($1.25 per 1M tokens); Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 supports more input modalities (text, image, video, file). Data via OpenRouter /models, as of Oct 29, 2026.

Source: OpenRouter /models · as of

OpenRouter model catalogue feed

These are provider-catalog specifications, not a task-quality benchmark. Prices describe the source listing and may vary by provider or routing. Unknown values are shown as — when the feed did not supply that value.

Side-by-side comparison

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 — data via OpenRouter /models, as of
MetricAnthropic: Claude Fable LatestMeta: Muse Spark 1.3
Context (tokens)1,000,0001,048,576
Input $/M$10.00$1.25
Output $/M$50.00$4.25
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, image, video, file
Output modalitiestexttext
Model id~anthropic/claude-fable-latestmeta/muse-spark-1.3

Frequently asked questions

Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Meta: Muse Spark 1.3?

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 has the larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of Oct 29, 2026.)

Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Meta: Muse Spark 1.3?

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper on input at $1.25 per 1M tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of Oct 29, 2026.)

What input types do Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 support?

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts text, image, file; Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 accepts text, image, video, file.

Model details

← All AI models

Open the prompt composer, then choose a model →

Open the composer and choose a supported target model. The reference catalogue may include models unavailable in the composer.