Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash: Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash offer the same context window (1,000,000 tokens); inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper on input ($0.07 per 1M tokens); Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest supports more input modalities (text, image, file). Data via OpenRouter /models, as of Oct 29, 2026.
Source: OpenRouter /models · as of
OpenRouter model catalogue feed
These are provider-catalog specifications, not a task-quality benchmark. Prices describe the source listing and may vary by provider or routing. Unknown values are shown as — when the feed did not supply that value.
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest | inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Context (tokens) | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Input $/M | $10.00 | $0.07 |
| Output $/M | $50.00 | $0.22 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Model id | ~anthropic/claude-fable-latest | inclusionai/ling-3.1-flash |
Frequently asked questions
Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash both support 1,000,000 tokens of context. (via OpenRouter /models, as of Oct 29, 2026.)
Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash?
inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper on input at $0.07 per 1M tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of Oct 29, 2026.)
What input types do Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash support?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts text, image, file; inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash accepts text.
Model details
Open the prompt composer, then choose a model →
Open the composer and choose a supported target model. The reference catalogue may include models unavailable in the composer.