Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro: Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest has the larger context window (1,000,000 tokens); IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper on input ($0.02 per 1M tokens); Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest supports more input modalities (text, image, file). Data via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.
Source: OpenRouter /models · as of 2026-07-11
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest | IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Context (tokens) | 1,000,000 | 131,000 |
| Input $/M | $10.00 | $0.02 |
| Output $/M | $50.00 | $0.11 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Model id | ~anthropic/claude-fable-latest | ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro |
Frequently asked questions
Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.)
Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro?
IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper on input at $0.02 per 1M tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.)
What input types do Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro support?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts text, image, file; IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro accepts text.
Model details
Build an optimized prompt for either model with Prompeteer →