Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B: Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest has the larger context window (1,000,000 tokens); Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on input ($0.06 per 1M tokens); both support 3 input modalities. Data via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.
Source: OpenRouter /models · as of 2026-07-11
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest | Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B |
|---|---|---|
| Context (tokens) | 1,000,000 | 262,144 |
| Input $/M | $10.00 | $0.06 |
| Output $/M | $50.00 | $0.33 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | image, text, video |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Model id | ~anthropic/claude-fable-latest | google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it |
Frequently asked questions
Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.)
Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on input at $0.06 per 1M tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.)
What input types do Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B support?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts text, image, file; Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B accepts image, text, video.
Model details
Build an optimized prompt for either model with Prompeteer →