Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google: Gemma 3 27B
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google: Gemma 3 27B: Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest has the larger context window (1,000,000 tokens); Google: Gemma 3 27B is cheaper on input ($0.08 per 1M tokens); Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest supports more input modalities (text, image, file). Data via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-13.
Source: OpenRouter /models · as of 2026-07-13
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest | Google: Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Context (tokens) | 1,000,000 | 131,072 |
| Input $/M | $10.00 | $0.08 |
| Output $/M | $50.00 | $0.16 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text, image |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Model id | ~anthropic/claude-fable-latest | google/gemma-3-27b-it |
Frequently asked questions
Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Google: Gemma 3 27B?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-13.)
Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Google: Gemma 3 27B?
Google: Gemma 3 27B is cheaper on input at $0.08 per 1M tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-13.)
What input types do Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and Google: Gemma 3 27B support?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts text, image, file; Google: Gemma 3 27B accepts text, image.
Model details
Build an optimized prompt for either model with Prompeteer →