Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google Gemini Flash Latest

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google Gemini Flash Latest: Google Gemini Flash Latest has the larger context window (1,048,576 tokens); Google Gemini Flash Latest is cheaper on input ($1.50 per 1M tokens); Google Gemini Flash Latest supports more input modalities (text, image, video, file, audio). Data via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.

Source: OpenRouter /models · as of 2026-07-11

Side-by-side comparison

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google Gemini Flash Latest — data via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11
MetricAnthropic: Claude Fable LatestGoogle Gemini Flash Latest
Context (tokens)1,000,0001,048,576
Input $/M$10.00$1.50
Output $/M$50.00$9.00
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, image, video, file, audio
Output modalitiestexttext
Model id~anthropic/claude-fable-latest~google/gemini-flash-latest

Frequently asked questions

Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Google Gemini Flash Latest?

Google Gemini Flash Latest has the larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.)

Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Google Gemini Flash Latest?

Google Gemini Flash Latest is cheaper on input at $1.50 per 1M tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.)

What input types do Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and Google Gemini Flash Latest support?

Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts text, image, file; Google Gemini Flash Latest accepts text, image, video, file, audio.

Model details

← All AI models

Build an optimized prompt for either model with Prompeteer →