Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image): Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest has the larger context window (1,000,000 tokens); Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) is cheaper on input ($2.00 per 1M tokens); Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest supports more input modalities (text, image, file). Data via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-13.
Source: OpenRouter /models · as of 2026-07-13
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest | Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) |
|---|---|---|
| Context (tokens) | 1,000,000 | 65,536 |
| Input $/M | $10.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/M | $50.00 | $12.00 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | image, text |
| Output modalities | text | image, text |
| Model id | ~anthropic/claude-fable-latest | google/gemini-3-pro-image |
Frequently asked questions
Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-13.)
Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image)?
Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) is cheaper on input at $2.00 per 1M tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-13.)
What input types do Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) support?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts text, image, file; Google: Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) accepts image, text.
Model details
Build an optimized prompt for either model with Prompeteer →