Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash: Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash has the larger context window (1,048,576 tokens); Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper on input ($1.50 per 1M tokens); Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash supports more input modalities (text, image, video, file, audio). Data via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.
Source: OpenRouter /models · as of 2026-07-11
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest | Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Context (tokens) | 1,000,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Input $/M | $10.00 | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | $50.00 | $9.00 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text, image, video, file, audio |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Model id | ~anthropic/claude-fable-latest | google/gemini-3.5-flash |
Frequently asked questions
Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash?
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash has the larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.)
Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash?
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper on input at $1.50 per 1M tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.)
What input types do Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash support?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts text, image, file; Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts text, image, video, file, audio.
Model details
Build an optimized prompt for either model with Prompeteer →