Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest has the larger context window (1,000,000 tokens); Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is cheaper on input ($0.25 per 1M tokens); Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest supports more input modalities (text, image, file). Data via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.
Source: OpenRouter /models · as of 2026-07-11
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest | Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) |
|---|---|---|
| Context (tokens) | 1,000,000 | 65,536 |
| Input $/M | $10.00 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $50.00 | $1.50 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | image, text |
| Output modalities | text | image, text |
| Model id | ~anthropic/claude-fable-latest | google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-image |
Frequently asked questions
Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.)
Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)?
Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is cheaper on input at $0.25 per 1M tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.)
What input types do Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) support?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts text, image, file; Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) accepts image, text.
Model details
- Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest full spec
- Google: Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) full spec
Build an optimized prompt for either model with Prompeteer →