Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro: Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window (1,048,576 tokens); Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper on input ($1.25 per 1M tokens); Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro supports more input modalities (text, image, file, audio, video). Data via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.
Source: OpenRouter /models · as of 2026-07-11
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest | Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Context (tokens) | 1,000,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Input $/M | $10.00 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | $50.00 | $10.00 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text, image, file, audio, video |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Model id | ~anthropic/claude-fable-latest | google/gemini-2.5-pro |
Frequently asked questions
Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.)
Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper on input at $1.25 per 1M tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of 2026-07-11.)
What input types do Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro support?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts text, image, file; Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts text, image, file, audio, video.
Model details
Build an optimized prompt for either model with Prompeteer →