Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest vs Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0: Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 has the larger context window (1,024,000 tokens); Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 is cheaper on input ($1.13 per 1M tokens); Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest supports more input modalities (text, image, file). Data via OpenRouter /models, as of Nov 10, 2026.
Source: OpenRouter /models · as of
OpenRouter model catalogue feed
These are provider-catalog specifications, not a task-quality benchmark. Prices describe the source listing and may vary by provider or routing. Unknown values are shown as — when the feed did not supply that value.
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest | Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Context (tokens) | 1,000,000 | 1,024,000 |
| Input $/M | $8.00 | $1.13 |
| Output $/M | $40.00 | $3.94 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| Model id | ~anthropic/claude-fable-latest | baidu/ernie-light-dt-1.0-intl |
Frequently asked questions
Which has a larger context window, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0?
Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 has the larger context window at 1,024,000 tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of Nov 10, 2026.)
Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest or Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0?
Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 is cheaper on input at $1.13 per 1M tokens. (via OpenRouter /models, as of Nov 10, 2026.)
What input types do Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest and Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 support?
Anthropic: Claude Fable Latest accepts text, image, file; Baidu: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 accepts text.
Model details
Open the prompt composer, then choose a model →
Open the composer and choose a supported target model. The reference catalogue may include models unavailable in the composer.